+405 642 9592
Kenneth@BCMSports.net
Integrity of the game…
Brian Crawford Memorial

Bouse Sports Complex

Hidden Valley • Integrity of the Game

Bouse Sports Complex

Choctaw, Oklahoma • Municipal Sports Facility • USSSA Baseball & Softball Activity • Governance Evolution • 2016–2026

Explore 2016–2026 History BCM Sports User-Group Study Primary Source Library
Bouse Sports Complex Hidden Valley facility research feature image
Primary Facility: Bouse Sports Complex
Location: Choctaw, Oklahoma
Address: 1333 N Indian Meridian Rd
Research window: 2016–2026 facility series

Independent research. Not an official USSSA or City of Choctaw report.
Standardized Facility Report

Direct / stand-alone Bouse Sports Complex activity

This population includes records in which Bouse Sports Complex is listed independently as the event facility. Multi-facility combinations are excluded from this direct population.

Calculated Team Entry Fees
$0
Baseball
$0
Softball
$0
Teams
0
Minimum Games
0
Minimum Umpire Assignments
0
Directors
0
Municipalities
0
Counties
0
League Calculated Team Entry Fees
$0
League Teams
0
Primary Facility Count
0
Interpretation: Calculated Team Entry Fees are analytical measures derived from participating teams multiplied by the publicly posted Team Entry Fee. They are not, by themselves, proof of actual receipts, facility revenue, municipal revenue, director income, profit, taxable income, bank deposits or disposition of funds.
Three Analytical Populations

Direct, associated and combined documented activity

Direct Primary Facility

$0

5,821 teams • 17,374 minimum games • 32,682 minimum umpire assignments.

Associated Multi-Facility

$0

3,269 teams • 10,908 minimum games • 21,212 minimum umpire assignments.

Combined Documented Footprint

$0

9,090 teams • 28,282 minimum games • 53,894 minimum umpire assignments.

ASSOCIATION IS NOT ALLOCATION. Multi-facility records establish that Bouse Sports Complex was associated with the same event as other facilities. They do not establish how teams, games, officials, fees or proceeds were allocated among individual locations.
Facility Governance Evolution

The same public asset under changing operating structures

The BCM Sports user-group study adds a governance layer to the facility research. Bouse can be examined across successive operating arrangements while the underlying municipal asset remains substantially constant.

2016–JUNE 2018

BCM Sports Era

BCM Sports served as the municipal field/program operator. Shootout Baseball supplied outside USSSA baseball programming; Midwest Sports Productions supplied outside USSSA softball programming.

SUMMER 2018–2020

Municipal Transition

BCM's operating relationship ended and the City resumed operation. Annual reports identify City-linked personnel among named tournament directors during the transition period.

2021–2024

Multi-Director Expansion

Large-scale tournament activity continued. Big Show Productions became increasingly prominent in softball while Shootout Baseball remained a recurring baseball producer.

OCT. 15, 2024 → 2026

Management Transition

City Council minutes document authorization for negotiations with OYBA, LLC dba Big Show Productions for management of City sports complexes. High-volume Bouse-related activity continued through 2026.

Connected User-Group Case Study

BCM Sports: the operator-side view of Bouse

The Bouse facility report asks what documented activity is associated with the public facility. The BCM Sports user-group study asks a different question: how did a community nonprofit interact with the City, the facility, tournament producers, officials, families, revenue streams and operational risk over time?

Open BCM Sports User-Group Study
BCM-Era Operating Network

One municipal complex. Multiple economic roles.

BCM Sports

Municipal field/program operator, community programming, BCM/Memorial events, and event-specific gate/official responsibilities.

Shootout Baseball

Rick Glasser / outside USSSA baseball tournament-provider relationship.

Midwest Sports Productions

Jeremy McDowell / outside USSSA softball tournament-provider relationship.

City + Other Operators

City ownership, municipal field-use obligations, officials, sanctioning activity and a separate concession structure created distinct financial streams.

Important distinction: BCM operating Bouse does not mean BCM received every Team Entry Fee associated with events held at the complex. Outside tournament-provider activity must remain separate from BCM Sports-only activity.
2016–2026 Annual Facility History

Bouse-related event-network reports

These annual reports capture Bouse Sports Complex and, where listed, satellite facilities used by the same events. The annual values below are therefore broader Bouse-related event-network measures and are not the same population as the direct stand-alone scorecards above.

Season / PeriodCalculated Team Entry FeesBaseballSoftballTeamsMin. GamesMin. Umpire AssignmentsFacilitiesDirectors
2016$0$0$000000
2017$0$0$000000
2018 Spring$0$0$000000
2018 Summer$0$0$000000
2019$0$0$000000
2020$0$0$000000
2021$0$0$000000
2022$0$0$000000
2023$0$0$000000
2024$0$0$000000
2025$0$0$000000
2026$0$0$000000
Scope warning: many later annual reports include Bouse plus satellite facilities. These totals describe the complete documented event configuration; they should not be presented as revenue or activity occurring exclusively on Bouse's physical fields.
Direct Stand-Alone Trend

Displayed annual direct Bouse activity

This separate trend uses the direct stand-alone Bouse population from the standardized facility report. Values are the displayed rounded annual amounts from that report and should not be mixed with the broader annual network table above.

Direct Calculated Team Entry Fee Trend
2016
$0
2017
$0
2018
$0
2019
$0
2020
$0
2021
$0
2022
$0
2023
$0
2024
$0
2025
$0
2026
$0
Displayed peak direct season: 2025, approximately $283.31K. The direct annual series shows material growth from the early Bouse years into the later tournament economy.
Public-Asset Research

What should be measured beyond tournament volume?

Public Investment & Operating Cost

Capital cost, maintenance, staffing, utilities, insurance, turf replacement and long-term capital needs.

Revenue Rights & Agreements

Field rental, gate, concessions, tournament access, leases, permits, subleases, sanctions and settlement arrangements.

Public Return

Direct municipal revenue, community recreation value, documented visitor spending, facility reinvestment and measurable benefit to residents.

Facility Documentation

Bouse Sports Complex photographs

Bouse Sports Complex aerial at night Bouse Sports Complex aerial view Bouse Sports Complex fields under lights
How to Read the Research

Facility profile vs. user-group case study

Facility Profile

Question: what documented activity is associated with Bouse Sports Complex and its multi-facility event network?

Best evidence: facility reports, event records, teams, fees, games, officials, directors and facility combinations.

BCM Sports User-Group Profile

Question: how did a nonprofit operator interact with a municipality, public sports asset, tournament providers, officials, families and financial streams?

Best evidence: City RFP/scope/termination records, BCM financial records, operating history and facility reports.

Calculated Team Entry Fee Methodology

A calculated measure of documented activity

Participating Teams × Publicly Posted Team Entry Fee = Calculated Team Entry Fees

Calculated Team Entry Fees are not, by themselves, verified receipts, gross revenue, facility or municipal revenue, director compensation, corporate revenue, profit, taxable income, bank deposits, gate receipts, concession revenue, umpire compensation, tax liability or audited financial statements.

Primary Source Library

Facility reports, City records & governance documents

City Record

City of Choctaw Bouse Sports Complex Request For Proposal

Open PDF →
City Record

Scope of Services and Responsibilities of BCM

Open PDF →
City Record

Termination for Professional Services

Open PDF →
Later Governance

Choctaw City Council Minutes — October 15, 2024

Open PDF →

Annual Bouse Sports Complex Facility Reports

Bouse Facility Report 2016PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2017PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2018 SpringPDF → Bouse Facility Report 2018 SummerPDF → Bouse Facility Report 2019PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2020PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2021PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2022PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2023PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2024PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2025PDF → Bouse Facility Report 2026PDF →
Evidence Boundaries

What the facility research establishes—and what it does not

Documented / Calculated
  • Facility and multi-facility associations
  • Teams, sports and displayed seasons
  • Minimum games and minimum umpire assignments
  • Director categories and municipality/county relationships
  • Publicly posted Team Entry Fees and Calculated Team Entry Fees
  • Documented City actions contained in the linked records
Not Established by the Dataset Alone
  • Actual payments collected or gross receipts
  • Facility, municipal, director or sanctioning-body revenue
  • Director compensation, profit or taxable income
  • Bank ownership or destination of withdrawals
  • Gate or concession allocation unless independently documented
  • Allocation of multi-facility activity to individual facilities
  • Motive, wrongdoing or legal liability
Research Synthesis

Why Bouse Sports Complex matters to the statewide research architecture

Bouse is no longer only a facility-level activity profile. It is a longitudinal municipal sports-governance case: a public asset observed through nonprofit operation, municipal transition, multi-director tournament expansion and later private-management negotiations. The BCM Sports case adds the operator-side history needed to understand why variables such as facility control, tournament directors, gate, concessions, officials, usage fees and public return became central to Hidden Valley.

Explore BCM Sports Case StudyBouse Sports Complex Portal