+405 642 9592
Kenneth@BCMSports.net
Integrity of the game…
Brian Crawford Memorial
  • Home
    • Home
  • Research
    • Research Hub
    • Better Together — Oklahoma Youth Sports
    • Directors & Organizations
    • Sports Facilities
    • Municipalities & Public Assets
    • Officials & Workforce
    • Data & Methodology
    • History & Archives
  • Case Studies
    • Case Studies Research Library
    • From Facility User to Community Asset Steward
    • The Shawnee Minutes
    • When a Memorial Became a Mission
  • Publications
    • Publications Hub
    • The Journey
    • Youth Sports Transparency
    • Reports & Executive Summaries
    • Lectures & Presentations
    • Podcasts & Video
  • About
    • About Baseball Heaven
    • Kenneth R. Crawford
    • Professional Resume & Leadership Portfolio
    • Contact
  • Participate
    • Community Forum
    • Survey
    • Survey Results
    • Submit Public Records & Source Documents
    • Challenge, Correct or Verify Data
    • Open Research Requests
    • Share Your Story / Historical Knowledge
    • Support Baseball Heaven
  • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Fields of Accountability
    • Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability
    • The Journey
    • The Shawnee Minutes
    • USSSA Directors – The Public Record
    • Youth Sports Transparency
  • Home
  • Research
  • Case Studies
  • Publications
  • About
  • Participate
  • Blog

Grady County – Chickasha Sports Complex, Tournament Fees & the Public-Record Test

Posted on Yesterday at 1:41 pm

Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability · Day 7 · October 22, 2026

Grady County: Chickasha Sports Complex, Tournament Fees & the Public-Record Test

Grady County • Chickasha • municipal ballfields, tournament economics, public finance and documented questions • Hidden Valley source seasons 2009–2025

Where did youth baseball and softball events take place, who managed the fields, what did the tournament-finance model project, and which public records could establish actual community benefit? Grady County’s source-coded records are concentrated at Chickasha Sports Complex, but a mixed school/complex label and multiple cross-county listings require cautious geographic attribution.

RESEARCH STATUS — SOURCE-CODED, NOT AUDITED: The figures below are formulas applied to the historical September 20, 2026 Hidden Valley division-row dataset. No figures should be characterized as collected gate receipts, tournament-operator profit, City revenue, verified visitor origin, actual hotel nights, tax collections, proven incremental economic impact or wrongdoing. Countywide metrics are based solely on 459 rows with the source County field exactly “Grady”; 62 multi-county Grady-labeled rows are separately withheld from the headline calculations until primary-site evidence is established.

144Distinct source event listings
459Division rows
4,836Team participations
$1,429,808Gross calculated entry fees
$1,331,000Modeled gate admissions
$2,860,624Modeled gross visitor spending
Explore the Grady County research:
1. County ledger 2. Municipality 3. Facility groups 4. Economic impact 5. Model formulas 6. Source variations 7. Geography audit 8. Facility control 9. Operators and collaboration 10. Public records 11. Government audits 12. Courts and DA 13. Records follow-up 14. Methods and sources 15. Corrections

1. Grady County historical tournament and finance ledger

The dataset contains 144 distinct event-listing identifiers across 459 division records for 4,836 team participations. Baseball accounts for 247 division rows and softball for 212. The earliest included listed date is March 13, 2009 and the latest June 20, 2025; lack of a 2026 Grady-labeled row in this snapshot does not prove no tournament occurred in 2026.

Historical source metricGrady County source-coded result
Distinct tournament listings144
Division rows459
Team participations4,836
Gross calculated team-entry fees$1,429,808
Modeled gross gate$1,331,000
Modeled gross concessions$665,500
Scenario-net concessions: 30% margin$199,650
Scenario-net concessions: 50% margin$332,750
Scenario-net concessions: 70% margin$465,850
Source total minimum games15,597
Official assignment slots30,266
Modeled umpire costs$1,210,640
Modeled team-sanction fee component$48,360
Modeled event-sanction fee component (row sum)$8,850
Source total sanction fees$57,210
CSV modeled day-trip spending (DayImpact)$411,060
CSV modeled overnight spending (OvernightImpact)$2,449,564
CSV modeled gross visitor spending (TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent)$2,860,624

Event methodology: TournamentID includes a dash-suffixed division number; count distinct prefixes before the first dash, not 459 full IDs as 459 tournaments. The 459 source rows contain 144 such distinct event prefixes and 143 distinct non-empty event URL strings, a minor identifier mismatch that remains disclosed. “Teams” means team appearances across divisions/events, not unique organizations or individual players.

Reproducible yearly context

Source seasonEvent prefixesDivision rowsTeam participationsGross entry feesModeled gross visitor spending
2009857440$95,180$324,088
20101466559$125,270$435,353
20111144355$81,893$250,393
20121124169$44,691$130,832
20131340272$65,188$164,152
20141959$12,613$39,117
2015415127$24,196$54,434
20161581$10,692$30,294
2017717274$117,229$171,258
2018926427$150,003$227,324
20191029445$132,371$235,790
20201233398$121,780$212,721
2021919315$105,426$151,912
20221643$8,270$16,082
20231345$21,285$29,835
20241843521$184,888$237,048
20251423306$128,833$149,991

The source Seasonid is a competition season identifier. Date-specific assignments use StartDate, and the seasonal counts above should not be confused with audited City fiscal years. Event listings spanning a source division are not independently counted as separate economic visitors.

2. Municipality-level reconciliation: Chickasha

All exact-Grady rows display Chickasha in the Municipality column. For analytical geographic aggregation, those division values are displayed under Chickasha; this is not a verification of legal ownership or City collection of the modeled revenues. The county and municipality totals agree solely because every included row has the same displayed municipality.

A. Tournament participation

Facility group / source labelDistinct eventsDivision rowsTeams
Chickasha1444594,836
COUNTY RECONCILED1444594,836

B. Gross financial activity

Facility group / source labelGross entryGross gateGross concessions
Chickasha$1,429,808$1,331,000$665,500
COUNTY RECONCILED$1,429,808$1,331,000$665,500

C. Concession margin scenarios

Facility group / source labelNet concessions 30%Net concessions 50%Net concessions 70%
Chickasha$199,650$332,750$465,850
COUNTY RECONCILED$199,650$332,750$465,850

D. Games, officials and operating models

Facility group / source labelMin gamesOfficial slotsModeled umpire costsSource sanction fees
Chickasha15,59730,266$1,210,640$57,210
COUNTY RECONCILED15,59730,266$1,210,640$57,210

E. Modeled visitor spending

Facility group / source labelDayImpactOvernightImpactTotal economic model
Chickasha$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624
COUNTY RECONCILED$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624

Read horizontally to see every metric. Concession “net” means the hypothetical retained share of estimated gross sales at the indicated margin, not a measured restaurant/vendor profit or a payment to the City.

3. Facility-label ledger: two attribution groups

The dataset has two exact-Grady Facility labels: a single Chickasha Sports Complex label and one combined high-school-and-sports-complex label. The five mixed-site division rows remain intact as a separate non-apportioned group; the 99 team participations are not attributed exclusively to the high school or the sports complex.

A. Tournament participation

Facility group / source labelDistinct eventsDivision rowsTeams
Chickasha Sports Complex1434544,737
Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex1599
COUNTY RECONCILED1444594,836

B. Gross financial activity

Facility group / source labelGross entryGross gateGross concessions
Chickasha Sports Complex$1,370,408$1,301,300$650,650
Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex$59,400$29,700$14,850
COUNTY RECONCILED$1,429,808$1,331,000$665,500

C. Concession margin scenarios

Facility group / source labelNet concessions 30%Net concessions 50%Net concessions 70%
Chickasha Sports Complex$195,195$325,325$455,455
Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex$4,455$7,425$10,395
COUNTY RECONCILED$199,650$332,750$465,850

D. Games, officials and operating models

Facility group / source labelMin gamesOfficial slotsModeled umpire costsSource sanction fees
Chickasha Sports Complex15,25529,582$1,183,280$56,145
Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex342684$27,360$1,065
COUNTY RECONCILED15,59730,266$1,210,640$57,210

E. Modeled visitor spending

Facility group / source labelDayImpactOvernightImpactTotal economic model
Chickasha Sports Complex$402,645$2,392,342$2,794,987
Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex$8,415$57,222$65,637
COUNTY RECONCILED$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624

Do not turn a source label into a title search. The City documents its management of Chickasha Sports Complex, but this edition has not independently checked assessor parcels, legal descriptions, deed chains or ground leases. For the single-city site, Chickasha is the analytical municipality and a City-operated facility is supported by official City materials. For the mixed Chickasha High School/complex label, school versus municipal field-level allocation and legal ownership remain unresolved.

4. Countywide modeled economic impact — original CSV sums

County modeled DayImpact: $411,060. County modeled OvernightImpact: $2,449,564. Their sum is $2,860,624 in the source TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent column. Despite the name “PerEvent,” the value is stored on each division row, and the county figure is a sum of those rows rather than 144 independently observed event spending reports.

Municipality reconciliation

Geographic level / facility labelDivision rowsDayImpact (CSV)OvernightImpact (CSV)TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent (CSV)
Municipality: Chickasha459$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624
COUNTY RECONCILED459$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624

Facility-label reconciliation

Geographic level / facility labelDivision rowsDayImpact (CSV)OvernightImpact (CSV)TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent (CSV)
Facility group: Chickasha Sports Complex454$402,645$2,392,342$2,794,987
Facility group: Chickasha High School, Chickasha Sports Complex5$8,415$57,222$65,637
COUNTY RECONCILED459$411,060$2,449,564$2,860,624

Exact reconciliation result: Chickasha municipality DayImpact $411,060 + OvernightImpact $2,449,564 = total $2,860,624. Adding the separate 2 facility-label rows gives exactly those same three amounts. No mixed-venue percentages, new spending multipliers or extra event-gate dollars are imposed.

Not verified incremental impact. These figures are modeled gross visitor-spending scenarios. They have not been adjusted for local resident spending, displacement from other local activity, substitutions between venues, leakage, baseline spending absent the event, purchases outside the county, overlapping visitor categories or verified occupancy. Never add entry fees, modeled gate, modeled concessions, hypothetical concession net, TotalEventNet or tax estimates to this modeled visitor-spending amount without a transaction-level overlap analysis. It is not proven economic impact, receipts, tax revenue, jobs, profit or public benefit.

5. Exact row-level model formulas and a worked example

These formulas are applied independently to each division record i. This report recomputed the source columns and found no mathematical mismatches within the 459 included rows for entry fees, gate, gross concessions, day spending, overnight spending, total modeled spending, official slots, umpire expenses or component sanction-fee additions.

Gross entry fees[i] = TeamsEntered[i] × EntryFeePerTeam[i] = TotalTeamEntryFee[i].
Modeled gate[i] = DailyFans[i] × DailyAdmissionFee[i] × TotalEventDays[i] = TotalEventGate[i]. The sampled Grady rows use 20 modeled daily fans per entered team and $5 admission; they are not turnstile records.
Gross concessions[i] = TotalEventGate[i] × 50% = TotalEventConcession[i]; the 50% ratio is a source projection, not observed sales.
Scenario-net concessions[i, m] = TotalEventConcession[i] × illustrative margin m, with m = 30%, 50%, or 70% — analytically separate from receipts.
Minimum games[i] = source TotalMinimumGamesPlayed[i]; the underlying minimum game guarantee is MinGameGuarantee but source scheduling assumptions can differ from actual games.
Official assignment slots[i] = TotalMinimumGamesPlayed[i] × UmpiresPerGame[i] = TotalEventUmpires[i], not unique human umpires.
Umpire costs[i] = TotalEventUmpires[i] × UmpirePayPerGame[i] = TotalEventUmpireFees[i], not payroll records.
Sanction model[i] = TeamUsssaSanctionFees[i] + EventUsssaSanctionFees[i] = TotalUSSSASanctionFees[i]; event component may repeat across division rows.
DayImpact[i] = TeamsEntered[i] × DayTripRate[i] × DayStay[i].
OvernightImpact[i] = TeamsEntered[i] × NightTripRate[i] × OverNightStay[i].
TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent[i] = DayImpact[i] + OvernightImpact[i], again stored per division row.

Worked Grady source row: 2009 Spring Training Shootout, division 15562-1

The source row has 5 entered teams, $85 DayTripRate, DayStay 1, $289 NightTripRate, and OverNightStay 2. Day spending = 5 × $85 × 1 = $425. Overnight spending = 5 × $289 × 2 = $2,890. The reported division-row total is $3,315. These are projections regardless of how many teams really traveled, booked rooms, or stayed overnight; two modeled rate streams may represent overlapping family spending.

The same row models entry fees from 5 teams × $237 = $1,185, a modeled three-day $5 admission at 100 projected daily fans = $1,500 gate, and modeled concessions at 50% of gate = $750 gross. None of those amounts is appended to the $3,315 visitor-spending model.

6. Preserve the dataset’s actual rate and stay variations

CSV source variableAll observed Grady source values and division-row frequencies
DayTripRate$85 × 459 division rows
NightTripRate$289 × 459 division rows
DayStay1 × 459 division rows
OverNightStay0 × 14 division rows; 1 × 135 division rows; 2 × 249 division rows; 3 × 61 division rows

In Grady County, the source DayTripRate is $85 and NightTripRate is $289 on all 459 rows; DayStay is 1 on every row, but OverNightStay varies across four values: 0 in 14 rows, 1 in 135, 2 in 249 and 3 in 61. The calculation preserves these differences row by row. It does not overwrite stays with one average or assert that the per-team rates were observed household purchases.

Source nightly and daily rates are assumed per-team model parameters; no separate count of actual nonresident team families, hotel folios, travel origin, lodging receipts, or economic multipliers was independently obtained for these source lines.

7. Geographic verification: multi-county events excluded

An additional 62 division rows elsewhere in the same CSV include “Grady” within a multi-county County label. They remain outside the headline Grady totals because their source Facility and Municipality fields often name multiple venues across city/county boundaries. The most common such labels include Grady, Oklahoma (42), Canadian, Grady, Oklahoma (5), Cleveland, Grady (3), Grady, Stephens (2), Canadian, Grady, Oklahoma, Seminole (2), Cleveland, Grady, Oklahoma (2). These 62 rows have a separate record-level primary-site watchlist.

Primary-facility rule: Assign an event to the county containing its documented primary host facility. Confirm the primary facility using dated brackets, event flyers, original venue reservations, city/school/tribal agreements and operator correspondence. A first-listed venue or municipality is a lead for verification, not verified venue priority. Until confirmed, the entire multi-county label stays in the unresolved category and does not inflate this county’s event, fee or spending totals.

Because source multi-county rows are excluded even where an event may also have included Grady-only divisions, the resulting ledger is source-coded and bounded, not a comprehensive measure of all business the Chickasha complex received.

8. Who controls the field? Municipal operations and ownership limits

The City of Chickasha Sports Complex / reservation page confirms a 15-field baseball/softball complex, home use by Chickasha Little League, public booking procedures and concessions run by the City or its designee. Its City-issued Sports Tournament Fees/Requirements PDF (undated online form) lists $250/field/day and a $300 deposit along with City concession terms and tournament submission requirements. The available online contract is undated; these terms must not be treated as a proven rate schedule for every year 2009–2025.

Ownership attribution protocol: (A) for a source single-municipality field with no contrary ownership evidence, attribute activity to its displayed municipality for analysis only, clearly marking deed title not verified; (B) override the analytical assumption if a verified county, tribal, school district, university, private deed or other ownership record exists; (C) preserve mixed-location facility labels without inventing split percentages. A City-operated field can be operated under an agreement rather than held in City fee-simple title.

Public-benefit verification ledger

City operation, private event scheduling, school/community field access and hospitality-tax interests may overlap. Required evidence includes signed field contracts and concessions allocation, tournament-day reservation logs, rental invoices/receipts, general-ledger deposits, tax/fee receipts, maintenance and labor costs, bonds/capital expenses, audited fund mapping, contemporaneous participant addresses and documented resident access. A facility can generate community value that cannot be determined from this tournament spreadsheet alone.

9. Collaboration and participating organizations — evidence boundaries

Current City information identifies Chickasha Little League as a user of the complex. The Hidden Valley TournamentDirector field names event/listing organizers or director labels, including Rick Glasser (234 division rows) and BIG Show Productions (168 rows). These are source labels, not signed contracts, findings of ownership, final revenue recipients or evidence of misconduct. Other labels also appear in the CSV; the reconciliation file retains the original source rows rather than making unsupported contractual assertions.

Possible collaboration among City staff, youth leagues, tournament providers, local businesses, volunteers, schools and public agencies should be evaluated using dated arrangements and rights/responsibilities. The case study’s purpose is to determine who scheduled, maintained, charged, collected, remitted, audited and granted public access—not to presume a conflict because organizations cooperated.

10. City finance, 2015–2016 reservations, and the documentary trail

The City financial transparency: budgets, audits and tax deposit reports provides official city budgets, the FY2024 independent audit and sales/use/lodging-tax materials. Aggregate sales or hotel-motel tax deposits are not event-specific receipts. Without hotel-night manifests, team geography and dated, matched tax receipts, it would be unsound to assign any tax-revenue percentage to the modeled $2,860,624 visitor-spending total.

Prior Chickasha open-records research: what was located and what remains unresolved

The researcher’s September 9, 2026 City of Chickasha open-records request sought historical sports-complex reservation and tournament-contract records, including support for a reported $10,000 non-refundable reservation amount communicated for a Brian Crawford Memorial 2016 weekend. The researcher received a City production dated October 1, 2026. The researcher’s comparison of that production reports that it did not include a contemporaneous City fee schedule, BCM-specific invoice, executed reservation agreement or other City document establishing that alleged $10,000 requirement. The underlying request and response are retained in the researcher’s source archive; the Researcher’s contemporaneous published retrospective: reported 2015 reservation call describes the original first-person recollection.

Unresolved, not adjudicated: The reported 2015 conversation is a recollection, not a verified City charge or collection. Failure to locate responsive records in this City production is not proof that no conversation occurred; it also does not establish any law was violated. The current research makes no fraud, personal misconduct or conflict-of-interest finding. Clarification should come from contemporaneous rates, approved reservation lists, written exemptions, staff authority records and affected participants’ right of response.

The prior production also identifies later transactional records involving sports-complex user groups. Such ledgers must be matched line by line to agreement, fund, deposit/refund and service descriptions; refundable deposits are liabilities until earned or lawfully reclassified, not automatically rental income. This edition makes no attempt to map those municipal accounting entries to the broader tournament model as one-for-one receipts.

11. Independent audits: City and County are separate reporting entities

City of Chickasha FY2024 audit: The City’s independent financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, publicly posted on its finance page, include findings 2024-001 (bank reconciliations without documented management review) and 2024-002 (EMS billing/collection monitoring). The report describes both as financial-statement significant deficiencies, not financial-statement material weaknesses. It identifies finding 2024-003 concerning late federal award audit-package submission as a federal compliance control material weakness; it reports no questioned costs for that item. The auditor’s report is dated March 27, 2026. See City of Chickasha FY2024 independent audit, pp. 61–65.

Grady County government FY2023 audit: The Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector’s audit covers the County fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, not the City. It identifies material weaknesses in countywide controls and expenditure/disbursement processes (including findings 2023-001 and 2023-003). Its regulatory-basis opinion and differences from GAAP should be understood within that reporting framework. These do not establish the City Sports Complex received or misused tournament fees. See Oklahoma State Auditor: Grady County FY2023 financial report.

Audit-to-tournament limitation: Public finance control findings can indicate records worth requesting, but neither government audit tests the entire Hidden Valley event model nor establishes that a specific tournament, organizer, school or public employee mishandled money. Any stronger claim would require a matching audited finding and transaction-level evidence.

12. Courts, official outcomes and the District Attorney’s jurisdiction

Oklahoma District Attorneys Council: District 6 identifies Jason Hicks as the District 6 District Attorney covering Caddo, Grady, Jefferson and Stephens counties. Criminal prosecutorial authority is geographically and legally bounded. The District Attorney is not the City’s accounting department, County Auditor or a general investigator for national nonprofit sanctioning disputes; federal allegations may implicate separate agencies and jurisdictions. Independent audit findings alone do not establish a prosecutable offense.

Official case and outcome check: This edition has not independently verified a Grady County court case and final judgment specifically arising from the listed tournament transactions; consequently no named tournament defendant, docket allegation, guilty finding, dismissal or court outcome is asserted. For any future specific claim, verify the case number, parties, tribunal, filed pleadings, docket chronology, signed orders, appeals and final disposition through the Oklahoma State Courts Network docket search and Grady County Court Clerk. A lawsuit or allegation alone is not a judicial finding.

13. Specific public records required and request status

Previously submitted: September 9, 2026 City of Chickasha request and October 1, 2026 response, summarized above. New requests below: research proposals only; this blog has not submitted additional public-records requests.

  1. Facility/title: County assessor parcel numbers, deeds, leases, ownership changes, 2015–2026 site maps, school-district use/management agreements, facility boundaries and master plans.
  2. Use authority: City Council minutes, current and historical resolutions, Parks & Recreation policies, tournament reservation applications and approvals, fee schedules, special rates, waived fees and cash-control rules.
  3. Receipts: Dated deposits, admissions records, participant-fee collections, box-office settlement reports, refunds, deposit-liability ledgers, concession point-of-sale reports, and city-versus-operator revenue allocation.
  4. Expenses: Field preparation, labor hours, utilities, equipment, umpire contract/payments, grounds expenses, concession inventory/purchases, security, capital debt and grants by facility and year.
  5. Event proof: Venue-specific schedules, dated brackets, tournament flyers, game logs, weather cancellations and director agreements for the 62 cross-county division records and 5 within-county mixed-field records.
  6. Public benefit: Resident-access times, Little League priority, fees/waivers for community groups, local participation, lodging-origin samples, independently verified taxable receipts and event-by-event net fiscal effect.
  7. Oversight: Audit engagement letters, audit management responses, remediation verification and city fund-account mapping for any sports-program receipts.

Use applicable Oklahoma Open Records Act statutory resources, the City Clerk linked from the City financial transparency: budgets, audits and tax deposit reports, and Grady County open-records request information for documents held by the County. Requests must be directed to the actual custodian: the City and County are distinct entities. Seek existing records rather than requiring officials to create retrospective financial calculations.

14. Research methods, source columns and exact reconciliation

Dataset control: AIUSSSA - HVIOG 9-20-2026.csv, authoritative snapshot identified as September 20, 2026. SHA-256: c8687be7b0543922e41563a2329cf131339486f5fb4f373bb69af3366f8b0256. The analysis includes County exactly “Grady,” excludes source labels with multiple counties, and does not silently reallocate revenue among fields within an unresolved multi-location group. All first-party monetary input values remain as stored.

Source columns: TournamentID, EventDivisionID, EventUrl, StartDate, Seasonid, Sport, EventName, County, Municipality, Facility, TournamentDirector, TeamsEntered, EntryFeePerTeam, TotalTeamEntryFee, DailyFans, DailyAdmissionFee, TotalEventDays, TotalEventGate, TotalEventConcession, MinGameGuarantee, TotalMinimumGamesPlayed, UmpiresPerGame, TotalEventUmpires, UmpirePayPerGame, TotalEventUmpireFees, TeamUsssaSanctionFees, EventUsssaSanctionFees, TotalUSSSASanctionFees, DayTripRate, NightTripRate, DayStay, OverNightStay, DayImpact, OvernightImpact, TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent.

Reconciliation: One county bucket (459 rows) = one municipality bucket (459 rows) = two facility-label buckets (459 rows). Each of the additive dataset components (TeamsEntered, financial components, games, official slots, sanctions, three economic columns) reconciles exactly across either grouping. Distinct event counts are set cardinalities within a group, not additive for overlapping events in general; in Grady the two facility-label groups contain disjoint source-event prefixes, so the 143 + 1 site-group counts happen to match countywide 144.

Sanction sensitivity: The baseline sums row-level EventUsssaSanctionFees as $8,850 over 118 charged division rows. As a non-authoritative comparison, assigning at most one positive event fee per distinct event prefix among the included exact-Grady rows produces $8,850 event-sanction model and $57,210 combined team-plus-event sanction scenario, versus the unaltered source baseline $57,210. Neither is verified actual sanction collections; national, state, participant and director remittances require primary ledgers.

Other limitations: Time periods and sport divisions are inherited from the source; minimum-game columns are scheduling models, not observed play-by-play outcomes; 20 fans per team and 50% modeled gross concession-to-gate are formula assumptions; umpire cost is based on 40 dollars per assignment slot in this county source and ignores changed rates, cancellations, paid crew composition, travel reimbursements, insurance, payroll taxes and actual contracts. The model cannot determine who collected entry fees or who retained admissions or concessions.

Primary public sources and archived researcher records

[1] City Sports Complex, facility details and reservation administration. City of Chickasha Sports Complex / reservation page

[2] City-issued tournament contract and concession/rental terms (undated copy). City-issued Sports Tournament Fees/Requirements PDF (undated online form)

[3] City financial transparency: FY2024 audit, budgets and revenue summaries. City financial transparency: budgets, audits and tax deposit reports

[4] City FY2024 audited financial statements and findings. City of Chickasha FY2024 independent audit, pp. 61–65

[5] Grady County FY2023 report, Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector. Oklahoma State Auditor: Grady County FY2023 financial report

[6] District 6 District Attorney (jurisdiction and office). Oklahoma District Attorneys Council: District 6

[7] OSCN: official court docket search. Oklahoma State Courts Network docket search

[8] Grady County Court Clerk and case record custodian. Grady County Court Clerk

[9] Oklahoma Open Records Act reference. Oklahoma Open Records Act statutory resources

[10] Researcher original published recollection (not independent proof of fee). Researcher’s contemporaneous published retrospective: reported 2015 reservation call

Research archive, not externally linked: City of Chickasha Open Records Request (submitted September 9, 2026); City response and attachments dated October 1, 2026; researcher’s “City of Chickasha / Matt Barnard / Big Show Productions / OYBA” executive summary. Verify original production documents before treating any derivative synopsis as an official City finding.

15. Right of response, corrections and research transparency

This publication welcomes factual corrections and documentary additions from the City of Chickasha, Grady County offices, any named event director or youth league, City sports staff, school districts, tournament families, and organizations whose participation or records are discussed. Useful responses include dated fee schedules, actual field-by-field hosting proof, receipts, audit excerpts, governing agreements, and information separating local attendance from traveling visitors.

Corrections protocol: Preserve the September 20 source baseline; log each updated primary record with URL/file name, custodian, document date, affected source event IDs, changed county assignment, changed calculations, effective article revision date and explanation. Replace wrong factual statements promptly, but do not silently delete previously disclosed modeling assumptions. Unresolved location rows stay unresolved until evidence is checked.

Accountability without prejudgment: Dataset entries, regulatory reports, allegations, an unanswered records request, a reporting omission or an audit control finding do not establish a crime, a specific person’s intent, fraud, unethical conduct or diversion of public assets. The purpose is to identify what is documented, what is modeled and what the public can reasonably ask officials to verify.

Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability — Day 7 | Grady County.
Research series: Hidden Valley — Integrity of the Game. Primary-site county attribution, documented public finance and transparent model assumptions.

Research publication status: prepared for WordPress; not automatically published. Return to top ↑

Previous Post
Midwest City – The MAC, Free Fall Baseball, and the Phase III Cost-and-Access Test
Next Post
Jace Sanchez – Owasso Sports Park North, Bentley Park, Tulsa Softball & the Public-Facility Record

Recent Posts

  • Owasso – Sports Park North and South, the $1.21 Million Drainage Decision, and the Community-Access Test October 22, 2026
  • Jace Sanchez – Owasso Sports Park North, Bentley Park, Tulsa Softball & the Public-Facility Record October 22, 2026
  • Grady County – Chickasha Sports Complex, Tournament Fees & the Public-Record Test October 22, 2026
  • Midwest City – The MAC, Free Fall Baseball, and the Phase III Cost-and-Access Test October 21, 2026
  • Susan Gibson Northeast Oklahoma Softball, Bentley Park, Sand Springs & the Public-Facility Record October 21, 2026

Categories

  • Case Study (23)
  • Oklahoma's Counties of Accountability (7)
  • Oklahoma's Fields of Accountability (16)
  • The Journey (27)
  • The Shawnee Minutes (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • USSSA Tournament Directors – The Public Record (10)
  • Youth Sports Transparency (8)

Doctoral Research

Integrity of the Game vs Economic Impact (Politics), The Oklahoma Business Plan.

Doctoral Study-Research

Facebook
YouTube

© Integrity of the Game… by Professor K…

Contacts

Kenneth@BCMSports.net
+405 642 9592