Oklahoma County brings together municipal parks, youth leagues, independent tournament directors, privately branded complexes and intercity tournaments. Who owns a field, who schedules it, and who receives fees can be three different answers. This day-three research provides every countywide calculation, comparable municipality/owner tables, exact multi-site holding rows and public-record questions—without passing estimates off as collections or proven new economic benefit.

1. Oklahoma County: historical tournament and financial activity

The following amounts come directly from source division rows, except illustrative net concessions, which applies an explicitly hypothetical 50% margin to the source modeled gross concession field. Gross entry fees, gate and concessions are not retained income or government receipts. Dates span source seasons 2001–2026.

2. Municipality / geographic activity — fully reconciled

The Municipality field is a research-location label, not evidence of ownership, receipt of admissions, or exclusive municipality control. Combined-city strings are assigned as a single unallocated geographic bucket; amounts are not split between locations. Event counts within groups are non-additive.

Reconciliation: Every one of the 3,421 source-coded division rows appears in exactly one line above; summing fees, teams, games, slots, gate, concessions, sanctions and economic model fields reproduces the county total. Distinct event counts do not sum to 913, because one event can have separate location groups.

3. Facility-owner attribution: presumed municipality unless contrary evidence

Specific source-backed examples: the City of Choctaw publicly lists Bouse Sports Complex but states that Big Show Productions currently manages league play; the City says it does not collect those league fees through its website. That current league-management statement does not prove who ran all earlier tournaments. Midwest City lists Reed Baseball Complex and the MAC as municipal reservation facilities; the MAC identifies a 2018 general-obligation-bond financing program. Edmond publishes its annual municipal audit and governs city park operations. None proves a director/owner’s historical share of any tournament’s gross receipts.

City-versus-owner caution: Labels such as Davis Ballpark, The Battlefields and private-branded sportsplexes are attributed to their displayed single municipality only under the requested assumption. Contracts, deeds, leases, and operating rights must supersede this classification when obtained. Schools and campuses are not relabeled as municipal property.

4. Exact facility labels and mixed-site inventory

Each facility entry is preserved exactly as displayed in the CSV. A comma-separated list of facilities is one combined-site data label, not a separate count at each venue. Reproducing the same event under every named facility would inflate historical activity. All 81 source facility groups are preserved below, and the complete machine-readable reconciliation accompanies this article.

Six prominent source facility groups (not exhaustive)

The full 81-row facility reporting inventory is visible in the expandable tables; owners and operators must still be checked with facility-specific public records. Combined-venue labels are retained as rows even when all venues are inside the same municipality.

5. Economic impact: a separate, transparent historical visitor-spending model

The Hidden Valley field TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent is named “PerEvent,” but values are present at the division row level. They are added once per county-assigned source row and are not multiplied by number of divisions or recounted per tournament. The model is a descriptive spending scenario, not measured hotel bookings, measured tourism, additional county economic output, net-new spending, sales taxes or public benefits.

Worked row-level example, 2001: One Davis Ballpark division entry lists five teams, a $85 day-trip rate and one day-stay multiplier: 5 × $85 × 1 = $425. Its overnight rate is $289 and overnight-stay multiplier is two: 5 × $289 × 2 = $2,890. Combined source-model amount: $3,315 for that division record. This is hypothetical modeled spending per participating team under the dataset assumptions, not five documented trip receipts.

As an illustrative sensitivity scenario only, limit each row’s modeled day-stay exposure to a maximum of 3 days and its overnight exposure to a maximum of 2; preserve zero-valued exceptions instead of imputing them. Under that alternate modeling ceiling the same source rows yield $2,426,035 day plus $14,282,380 overnight = $16,708,415. This is a cap-based stress test, not a revised verified economic-impact finding. A truly incremental local model would additionally exclude local spending displaced from elsewhere, identify party origin, verify room occupancy and receipts, and address double-counting, leakages and costs.

6. Reproducible arithmetic and integrity controls

Illustrative concession margin sensitivity: 30% net margin gives $1,861,860; 50% gives $3,103,100; 70% gives $4,344,340. The published 50% row is a scenario, not verified income. Fees, admissions and gross concessions must never be added to modeled visitor impact without evaluating overlap.

All three independent grouping systems—source municipality, exact facility string and provisional owner class—pass full additive reconciliations to the 3,421-row county ledger. The companion CSV contains those groups and is useful for reproducing the arithmetic in spreadsheet software.

7. Primary-host county verification, apparent mapping conflicts and exclusions

The strongest county approach is to assign the event to the county of its independently established primary host facility. A source municipality is a lead, not proof. If several venues are listed across county lines, preserve the record in a watchlist until event-date brackets, venue schedules, approved field reservations, signed agreements or similar primary evidence confirms location.

For example, the CSV places a Reaves Park division in an Oklahoma County/Midwest City field, although the City of Norman identifies Reaves Park as a Norman park. Other source-coded combinations mention Buck Thomas Park / Moore or Wildhorse Park / Mustang. Some are combined-site entries and might correctly have had an Oklahoma County primary host elsewhere; the point is to flag and verify, not automatically move an event. These 19 rows remain visible inside the source-labelled county totals pending host adjudication.

The cross-county watchlist has 215 rows, 80 distinct watchlisted event IDs and $1,602,978 source-calculated gross entry fees outside the Oklahoma-only ledger. Watchlist event IDs can overlap events already represented in the Oklahoma-only extract, so adding them directly to the headline would inflate the analysis.

A separate October 16 evidence audit of 123 multi-facility Oklahoma USSSA event leads found event-date host documents unverified for many entries. Before making new requests, compare pending City reservations/agreements already requested against the specific 2011–2017 candidate event dates. The downloadable watchlist below identifies each mixed-county event and each in-ledger geographic anomaly.

8. Public facilities, shared opportunities and the money-flow questions

Economic development must be evaluated from both directions: potential visitor activity and local opportunity costs. A true net public benefit would also account for capital and operating spending, facility depreciation, field access for residents, potential displacement of regular leagues, public revenue actually deposited, concession recipients, and whether outside visitors would have spent locally anyway. Shared reservation standards, transparent rate sheets, cross-city emergency scheduling and public fee reports are practical collaboration opportunities worth exploring without presuming any misconduct.

9. Courts, allegations, outcomes and Oklahoma County DA jurisdiction

Oklahoma County is within Oklahoma District Attorney District 7, whose DA is Vicki Zemp Behenna according to the Oklahoma District Attorneys Council. That office prosecutes relevant state criminal charges within its jurisdiction; it is not the municipal audit department, public-record adjudicator, USSSA sanctioning body, or a substitute for agency fact-finding. Cleveland or Canadian County venue questions may belong to other judicial districts once the location is independently verified.

Case-outcome verification status, October 18, 2026: This edition has not established an Oklahoma County case number, charging document, judgment, dismissal or acquittal directly tied to the tournament rows published here. Therefore no individual or organization is labeled as charged, convicted, cleared or liable on the basis of this dataset. Claims in complaints or pending litigation, when located later, will be distinguished from findings and docket dispositions. Court-research leads include the Oklahoma State Courts Network docket search and actual filed pleadings, orders and certified outcomes; this is not a claim that no relevant case exists.

10. Independent audits: exact findings, scopes and limitations

Municipal annual financial statements and state/county audits have distinct scopes. Neither the existence of an audit finding nor a clean financial-statement opinion proves how historical USSSA tournaments distributed entry fees, admissions or concessions. Below are actual reviewed official report contents and specific audit limitations, not findings imputed to youth sports.

Primary-source documents: Oklahoma City FY2024 Single Audit Report (24-page PDF; schedule of findings pp.9–15); Edmond FY2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (auditor pp.9–11); Choctaw yearly audit library; Oklahoma County finance and audit index; Oklahoma State Auditor & Inspector.

11. Existing public-record requests and the missing primary receipts

Before submitting overlapping Oklahoma Open Records Act requests, check the existing city productions and determine which event-date reservation, host declaration, permits and finance ledgers are not already covered. The status below is the most recently documented status available in the research archive—not a guarantee of current processing as of October 18.

Useful public-facing access routes: Oklahoma County open records, City of Oklahoma City records requests and City of Edmond request portal. Ask for existing records rather than demanding new retrospective financial analyses.

12. Research sources, right of response and correction policy

• Controlling research dataset: AIUSSSA - HVIOG 9-20-2026.csv, historical Oklahoma USSSA events and divisions, 2001–2026, 65 columns. Current working copy provided with the research series; not an audited financial ledger.
• Event/date host research: Hidden Valley October 16, 2026 123-event municipality archive/primary-host audit; candidate locations are not finally assigned absent event-specific reservation/bracket evidence.
• City of Choctaw, Bouse Sports Complex public operations/league-play page, accessed for this edition Oct. 18, 2026.
• City of Midwest City, MAC facility and GO-bond overview. Also inspect City Reed Complex municipal listing.
• City of Norman, Reaves Park location for source mismatch review.
• Oklahoma District Attorneys Council, current districts and jurisdiction.
• Oklahoma City FY2024 Single Audit, signed Jan. 7, 2026 for federal audit; numbered findings are not a tournament conclusion.
• Edmond FY2025 ACFR, opinion dated Dec. 22, 2025.
• Oklahoma State Courts Network for any future case-specific disposition review.
• Historical City of Choctaw Request 389 Oct. 13 receipt and City of Edmond ORR-2026-771 Oct. 13 portal status, retained in the project public-record archive.

Readers who can verify a primary tournament host, identify field ownership, supply a dated facility-use agreement or provide a full official docket or audit disposition are invited to submit documentation for review at kenneth@bcmsports.net. Corrections will identify the source, affected row, date and recalculated county/municipal totals; raw input values and the change log should be preserved.