+405 642 9592
Kenneth@BCMSports.net
Integrity of the game…
Brian Crawford Memorial
  • Home
    • Home
  • Research
    • Research Hub
    • Better Together — Oklahoma Youth Sports
    • Directors & Organizations
    • Sports Facilities
    • Municipalities & Public Assets
    • Officials & Workforce
    • Data & Methodology
    • History & Archives
  • Case Studies
    • Case Studies Research Library
    • From Facility User to Community Asset Steward
    • The Shawnee Minutes
    • When a Memorial Became a Mission
  • Publications
    • Publications Hub
    • The Journey
    • Youth Sports Transparency
    • Reports & Executive Summaries
    • Lectures & Presentations
    • Podcasts & Video
  • About
    • About Baseball Heaven
    • Kenneth R. Crawford
    • Professional Resume & Leadership Portfolio
    • Contact
  • Participate
    • Community Forum
    • Survey
    • Survey Results
    • Submit Public Records & Source Documents
    • Challenge, Correct or Verify Data
    • Open Research Requests
    • Share Your Story / Historical Knowledge
    • Support Baseball Heaven
  • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Fields of Accountability
    • Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability
    • The Journey
    • The Shawnee Minutes
    • USSSA Directors – The Public Record
    • Youth Sports Transparency
  • Home
  • Research
  • Case Studies
  • Publications
  • About
  • Participate
  • Blog

Carter County – Ardmore’s Regional Park, YMCA Agreements, $1.62 Million Turf Approval & the Public-Benefit Ledger

Posted on Yesterday at 12:58 pm
Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability · Day 13 · Integrity of the Game

Carter County: Ardmore’s Regional Park, YMCA Agreements, $1.62 Million Turf Approval & the Public-Benefit Ledger

A documented comparison of historical USSSA division models, City of Ardmore park partnerships and audited public finance—asking what the public can verify about facility costs, programs, access and benefits.

Research date: October 28, 2026 · Historical source seasons: 2002–2026 · Research status: review-ready draft, not published · County: Carter, Oklahoma

Research disclosure — financial and visitor-spending models are NOT verified revenue or independent economic impact. Source figures estimate team entry fees, admissions, concession spending, officiating and travel-related spending from assumptions. They do not establish cash collections, taxable sales, property ownership, actual profit, government revenue, net new local spending, public benefit, criminal activity or wrongdoing. Do not add visitor-spending scenarios to entry/gate/concession/net sums without an overlap study. Dataset events may repeat team participants or include canceled activities.
Jump to: County totalsFacility groupsEconomic impactCity agreementsMethodologyOpen recordsSources

1. Countywide public-record question

Ardmore’s public ballfields support organized youth sports, tournaments, recreation and the area’s visitors. The question is not whether youth sports are valuable; the question is what documented municipal agreements, source-data estimates, underlying receipts, independent audits and community-access measures can actually establish. The September 20, 2026 Hidden Valley historical file associates 90 distinct USSSA event URLs with 151 clearly Carter County division rows, including 3,840 team participations. One additional mixed Carter/Oklahoma division remains outside the headline ledger until its primary facility is verified.

90Distinct source event URLs
151Carter-attributed division rows
$1,269,626Modeled gross team-entry value
$1,217,200Modeled gross gate
$2,370,490Modeled gross visitor-spending scenario

2. Carter County historical financial and operations ledger

Source amounts below are historical model outputs from rows with original County = Carter. Teams are participations, not deduplicated families or unique organizations. Event identifiers are distinct nonblank EventUrl strings rather than every TournamentID division-row key.

Research metricClear Carter attribution
Distinct source event URLs90
Division rows151
Team participations (not unique teams)3,840
Gross team-entry fees$1,269,626
Modeled gross gate$1,217,200
Modeled gross concessions$608,600
Concession contribution: 30% scenario$182,580
Concession contribution: 50% scenario$304,300
Concession contribution: 70% scenario$426,020
Source-estimated minimum games10,326
Officials assignment slots20,602
Modeled umpire expenses$824,080
Source-modeled sanction fees$45,225
DayImpact modeled day-trip spending$360,495
OvernightImpact modeled overnight spending$2,009,995
TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent, SUM of division rows$2,370,490

Source-modeled event income across these rows is $3,095,426 (entries + gate + modeled concession gross). Source-modeled partial event net after the two modeled deductions for umpires and sanction fees is $2,226,121. Neither is an audited result or a profit figure; additional operating costs, event cancellations, refunds, financial custody and municipal revenue-sharing are unknown.

3. Ardmore: municipality and facility-label reconciliation

All 151 included records have Municipality = Ardmore. Because a venue’s displayed municipality is not proof of deed ownership, the municipal attribution in this table identifies geography only. Source-provided compound facility labels are not split across parks. The three rows that name both Regional Park and Ardmore Youth Baseball remain a separate unresolved group.

Original facility label (municipality Ardmore)EventsDivision rowsTeam participationsEntry grossGate modeledConcessions grossConcessions 30%Concessions 50%Concessions 70%Minimum gamesOfficial slotsUmpire costsSanction fees
Ardmore Regional Park50761,928$674,675$519,500$259,750$77,925$129,875$181,8255,91711,793$471,720$23,030
Ardmore Youth Baseball37721,735$529,815$644,600$322,300$96,690$161,150$225,6103,8817,753$310,120$20,200
Ardmore Regional Park, Ardmore Youth Baseball33177$65,136$53,100$26,550$7,965$13,275$18,5855281,056$42,240$1,995
CARTER COUNTY — RECONCILED901513,840$1,269,626$1,217,200$608,600$182,580$304,300$426,02010,32620,602$824,080$45,225
Facility attribution and ownership control: The City’s own minutes document city decisions and YMCA operating permissions at Regional Park, but they do not furnish legal deed/title for every field. The Ardmore Youth Baseball entry may be an organization-style facility label; do not assume that its historical rows took place at Cardinal Park or that the organization owns the property. The combined Regional Park / Ardmore Youth Baseball label remains physically unallocated. Any future documented county, school, tribal or private ownership will supersede a municipality-only analytical default; no such ownership is asserted without recorded title, lease, trust or interlocal document.

4. Dedicated countywide modeled economic-impact ledger

$360,495 day-trip scenario + $2,009,995 overnight scenario = $2,370,490 total source-modelled gross visitor spending. These are exact sums of the frozen original CSV fields DayImpact, OvernightImpact and TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent for the 151 included division rows. The name TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent is potentially misleading: its value exists on each division record and should be summed across those division records, not treated as a single, unique event-level value.

Source facility (all Ardmore)Division rowsEventsΣ DayImpactΣ OvernightImpactΣ TotalEconomicImpactPerEvent
Ardmore Regional Park7650$163,880$944,163$1,108,043
Ardmore Youth Baseball7237$181,570$963,526$1,145,096
Ardmore Regional Park, Ardmore Youth Baseball33$15,045$102,306$117,351
CARTER COUNTY — RECONCILED15190$360,495$2,009,995$2,370,490

Reconciliation: 76 + 72 + 3 = 151 rows; 50 + 37 + 3 = 90 distinct event URLs (no cross-group event URL overlap in these included rows). Across the same disjoint groups, day-trip sums equal $360,495, overnight sums equal $2,009,995 and total spending sums equal $2,370,490. Citywide Ardmore and countywide Carter represent the same set here; they are not two economic benefits to add together.

Preserved historical rate and stay variations

Among all 152 Carter-referencing source rows, DayTripRate is $85 in 142 rows and $25 in 10 rows; NightTripRate is $289 in 142 rows and $0 in 10 rows; DayStay is 1 in 149 rows and 30 in 3 rows; OverNightStay is 2 in 95 rows, 1 in 39, and 0 in 18. The calculation uses the actual four values stored on EACH record—not a single county-average rate, not an invented hotel multiplier. Those rates are historical model assumptions and do not establish where money was spent, whether visitors stayed overnight, or how many households attended.

Worked 2002 division-row example

For source TournamentID 15018-1, the April 19, 2002 Oklahoma/Texas Shootout division has 12 team participations, DayTripRate = $85, DayStay = 1, NightTripRate = $289 and OverNightStay = 2. Day trip = 12 × $85 × 1 = $1,020; overnight = 12 × $289 × 2 = $6,936; source division-row total = $7,956. This is not evidence that 12 out-of-county teams traveled or booked rooms. Another division of the same tournament has its own row and must not be interpreted as a second distinct event.

Economic-impact boundary. These calculations are modeled gross visitor-spending scenarios, not independently measured incremental local economic impact. Without a resident/nonresident split, substitution/crowding-out analysis, geographically limited purchases, duration validation, multipliers (if relevant), net expenditure treatment and primary-source lodging/sales data, they do not establish economic benefit. In particular, do not add $1,217,200 modeled gate, $1,269,626 entries, $608,600 concessions or $2,226,121 source-net to the $2,370,490 travel-spending scenario: portions could overlap. None of these data prove actual receipts, local sales-tax generation, fund balances or an operator’s profit.

5. Concession model: gross versus three cost assumptions

The CSV fixes TotalEventConcession = 50% × TotalEventGate on these rows. It does not contain original cash register transactions. We apply separate 30%, 50% and 70% hypothetical contribution rates to the source’s $608,600 modeled gross concession amount. A model contribution is not actual concession “net” without invoices, inventory costs, labor, utilities, fees, tax and the contracted distribution of proceeds.

Modeled concession contribution onlyCountywide amountInterpretation
30% of modeled concession gross$182,580Illustrative contribution after hypothetical 70% concession cost
50% of modeled concession gross$304,300Illustrative contribution after hypothetical 50% cost
70% of modeled concession gross$426,020Illustrative contribution after hypothetical 30% cost

6. The two-county facility question: one unresolved event

A 2020 source division (TournamentID 9817, 7th Annual El Gigante NIT 8GG (16u/18u)) displays County = Carter, Oklahoma and Facility = Ardmore Regional Park, Del City Ball Park. It includes an Ardmore complex and the Del City area in Oklahoma County, but the source does not establish which site was its primary playing facility. The one division has 11 team participations, $4,334 modeled entry value, $3,300 gate, $1,650 concessions, 54 modeled games, 108 umpire slots, $4,320 umpire cost, $185 sanctions and $7,293 visitor-spending scenario ($935 day + $6,358 night). These figures are held outside Carter’s headline totals. An automated provisional crosswalk does not replace venue confirmation.

Assignment controlDivision rowsDecision
Only clearly Carter-labelled CSV divisions151Included once, source facility preserved
Ardmore-labelled groups within Carter151Three disjoint source facility labels; same city view not added a second time
Mixed Carter/Oklahoma facility division1Excluded from headline until primary physical venue independently established
All Carter-referencing source division rows152151 clear + 1 excluded = 152

If eventually verified as Carter-primary, the Carter-source pool would be 91 event URLs, 152 rows and $2,377,783 modeled visitor spending. That is a conditional sensitivity illustration only, not an asserted county allocation. Do not book the same event to both counties.

7. Official municipal decisions: YMCA agreements and field access

The June 20, 2023 Ardmore City Commission approved three distinct YMCA-related arrangements: (a) a Regional Park concession-operations agreement (discussion describes prior YMCA concession activity dating to March 2000 and percentage-of-gross payments to the City); (b) use of the Ardmore Regional Park North Softball Complex, 3045 Softball Complex Road, four fields; and (c) use of the Cardinal Park Southeast Baseball/Softball Complex, 1002 East Main. The separate field-use agreements described July 1, 2023–June 30, 2024 initial terms with stated extension provisions. Each approval carried an affirmative commission vote of five to zero. [S2: official June 20, 2023 commission minutes].

Those minutes describe the City’s proposed utility support for Cardinal Park and YMCA responsibilities for grounds, program operations and fee scholarships. They do not quantify actual concession receipts, YMCA tournament gate receipts, individual director income, reimbursements or current agreement performance. The agreement’s renewal/termination status after 2024 must be verified through later executed instruments and correspondence. Neither the YMCA’s documented use of a field nor a label in the USSSA CSV proves that the YMCA operated each listed historical event.

8. Public finance: $1,623,613.82 approved Regional Park turf agreement

The July 7, 2025 Ardmore Commission minutes record approval of a contract with Synturf LLC, doing business as Forever Lawn Tulsa/Oklahoma City, for artificial turf on eight baseball/softball infields and two playgrounds at Regional Park. Approved contract amount: $1,623,613.82; staff discussed a $1.7 million Parks/General Fund budget item. The vote was 5–0. [S3: official July 7, 2025 commission minutes]. Contract authorization is not proof of total cash disbursed, work accepted, final cost, specific funding split, or a return on investment. A later 2026 proposed change order should not be described as adopted without approved minutes and paid invoices.

Potential public-benefit tests include resident versus visitor use, weather closures after turf installation, playable games, youth scholarships, inclusion of low-income participants, reservation equality, time given to independent leagues, maintenance cost, contracted compensation, concession remittances and condition of the fields. The Hidden Valley dataset is not a measurement of these outcomes.

9. City versus county audits—and an important omitted-authority caveat

The City of Ardmore FY2025 independent audit [S4] contains a fairly presented primary-government opinion with a significant emphasis of matter: the City's report omits six legally separate component units. The notes specifically identify Ardmore Regional Park Authority and explain that the City provides significant funding for its operations; the Authority’s component-unit financial activity is not included in this primary-government financial presentation. This omission is a financial-reporting scope qualification to understand, not an accusation. Its separate financial statements, if available, should be requested to complete the public-benefit picture.

Separately, the Oklahoma State Auditor’s Carter County FY2021 report [S5] covers county government, not the City of Ardmore, the Regional Park Authority, YMCA, Ardmore Youth Baseball or a private tournament director. County audit findings or financial classifications cannot be transplanted to unrelated organizations or treated as evidence about tournament receipts. No county-wide findings are attributed here to municipal sports organizers.

10. Municipal collaboration and community opportunity

The City, parks staff, regional park authority, YMCA programs, Ardmore Youth Baseball participants, schools, private teams, tournament directors, concession providers, volunteers and families can all contribute to sustainable and accessible play. The task is to document which entity scheduled which site, which party held gate or concession revenue, what reporting the City required, what youth scholarships were available and whether public capital improvements advanced year-round community use. Collaboration and transparency are not mutually exclusive: a shared field calendar, published fee rules, accessible scholarships, timely repairs and annual program-level reporting would make the discussion more constructive.

11. District attorney jurisdiction, official court records and careful attribution

Carter County is within Oklahoma District Attorney District 20 (together with other designated counties). Prosecutorial boundaries do not transform a privately generated dataset estimate into proof of any crime, and a district attorney office does not automatically audit municipal admissions or a nonprofit’s books. Any actual legal allegation should be checked against official OS CN / court clerk dockets by exact caption, case number, court and final disposition, and any Oklahoma State Auditor finding should be read in its original scope. [S9: official Oklahoma court-docket search]. No Carter County youth-sports-related criminal finding, civil judgment or court outcome was verified for this report, so none is asserted. Statements describing statewide USSSA disputes are background only unless the specific venue and case are independently linked.

12. Open Records Act tracking: Ardmore submission already documented

Request submitted by researcher: October 15, 2026 at 7:48 a.m., email from Kenneth R. Crawford to records@ardmorecity.org and llinney@ardmorecity.org, with attached three-page Ardmore Open Records Request 2026-10-15.pdf. Subject: Formal Oklahoma Open Records Act Request — Ardmore Regional Park, YMCA Agreements & Youth Sports Facilities (2001–2026). Status as of this research: submission documented in research correspondence; no agency tracking number, substantive production or completed response has been independently established here. No new request was submitted by this Day 13 preparation.

The eight records categories request existing (1) title/ownership and operating authorities, (2) executed YMCA agreements, renewals and concession allocation, (3) field reservations/permits/cancellations, (4) City gate/concession/rental receipts and remittances, (5) capital procurement invoices and turf change orders, (6) scoreboards/utilities/work orders, (7) governance, public access and conflicts of interest policies, and (8) youth scholarships, program results and resident access. Original records are requested from the entity in possession; City records cannot be assumed to include independent businesses’ private accounts. Electronic and phased production and fee advance notice were requested.

Next verification checkpoints: capture the City’s acknowledgement/reference number, exact response/production dates, any itemized fee estimate, documented exemptions or redactions, renewals and executed financial terms, payment registers for the turf project, Regional Park Authority separate audits, venue-specific logs for 2020 mixed-site event 9817, and all corrections/answers. Record the answer even if an agency reports no responsive records. Request dates and response times should not be presented as agency violations without statutory analysis and a complete timeline.

13. Reproducible source calculations and assumption controls

Source: AIUSSSA - HVIOG 9-20-2026.csv. Preserve source money values in nominal dollars and the original labels/season years. A distinct EventUrl is the event-count key. TournamentID may encode separate division rows; no summation should be grouped solely by a text name. Formula audit performed row-by-row on 152 Carter-referencing divisions: 13 formula identities, zero observed arithmetic mismatches (this does not validate economic realism or cash custody).

Reported metricSource column(s) / calculationWhat it actually represents
Event countCOUNT(DISTINCT EventUrl)Distinct source event pages, not division count.
Division count / team participationCOUNT(rows); SUM(TeamsEntered)Division records; team participations repeat across events.
Entry fee grossSUM(TeamsEntered × EntryFeePerTeam) = SUM(TotalTeamEntryFee)Potential registration value before discounts, refunds, allocation, collection proof.
Modeled daily gateDailyFans × DailyAdmissionFee = TotalGateAdmissionFeeConstructed daily attendance scenario, not turnstile count.
Modeled event gateTotalGateAdmissionFee × TotalEventDays = TotalEventGateMay materially overstate league admissions; day counts can be 30+ days.
Modeled concession grossTotalEventConcession = 50% × TotalEventGateSource uses 50% gate proxy, NOT measured concession receipts.
Concession scenario contributionTotalEventConcession × 0.30, 0.50 or 0.70Illustrative margins; excludes many overhead and government costs.
Minimum gamesceil(TeamsEntered × MinGameGuarantee ÷ 2) + (TeamsEntered − 1)Source estimated minimum games; not an observed game ledger.
Official assignmentsTotalMinimumGamesPlayed × UmpiresPerGame = TotalEventUmpiresOfficial assignment slots; NOT distinct umpire people or payroll.
Umpire feesTotalEventUmpires × UmpirePayPerGame = TotalEventUmpireFeesModeled cost; source $40 per slot in these records.
Sanction feesTeamUsssaSanctionFees + EventUsssaSanctionFeesSource-modeled transfer amounts, not confirmed remittances.
Day-trip spendingTeamsEntered × DayTripRate × DayStay = DayImpactPer division scenario; use each original row's rate and stay.
Overnight spendingTeamsEntered × NightTripRate × OverNightStay = OvernightImpactPer division scenario; not nights actually booked.
Source "PerEvent" spendingDayImpact + OvernightImpact = TotalEconomicImpactPerEventDespite label, stored EACH DIVISION ROW; SUM of rows by group.
Source modeled event incomeTotalTeamEntryFee + TotalEventGate + TotalEventConcessionModelled, not verified operator receipts.
Source modeled event netTotalEventIncome − TotalEventUmpireFees − TotalUSSSASanctionFeesPartial pre-other-cost accounting scenario; not actual profit.

Interpretation controls: DailyFans is a source-model spectator estimate, potentially varying with team counts. MinGameGuarantee creates an estimated minimum game count but is not a final bracket result. Umpire assignment slots are not distinct paid people. The source’s LeaguePhase marks 13 division rows/6 event URLs as League Play, carrying $144,000 modeled gross gate; the day-count assumptions for recurring leagues should be independently tested. Three separate divisions with DayStay=30 have high modeled day-trip values. At least four divisions contain rainout/rained-out language in EventName, and therefore modeled gate or fees should not be reported as actual amounts collected. The downloadable watchlist preserves these cases rather than deleting them.

14. Evidence quality, right of response and corrections

Documented: dated city commission motions and votes, original research dataset columns and the October 15, 2026 submission email. Modeled: entry/gate/concessions/umpires/sanctions/travel spending in the CSV. Needs verification: individual park legal title, actual event/operator cash accounts, distinct venue assignment, 2025 turf final invoices and post-2023 renewals, separate Regional Park Authority statements, substantive records-request production, cancellation/refund treatment and any official case outcome. No allegation of wrongdoing or inference of guilt arises from a modeled amount, public grant, audit-scope omission or unproduced record.

The City Clerk, Parks and Recreation, Regional Park Authority, YMCA of Ardmore, Ardmore Youth Baseball organizations, event directors and any documented field owner/operator are invited to provide dated contracts, location records, corrections and contextual explanations. Corrections should identify the affected EventUrl/TournamentID and dataset vintage, quote the primary record, state whether the change is a factual fix or model-assumption revision, and preserve a dated correction history on the public article. Protected personal information about minors should not be disclosed.

15. Evidence and government-record register

Official source links below permit independent checking of votes, contracts and audit scope. The original dataset is a public-data-derived research workbook/CSV and is not a replacement for primary City or vendor accounting ledgers.

RefPrimary recordAccessScope / limitation
S1Hidden Valley / AIUSSSA public-data model, frozen Sept. 20, 2026Research CSV (research working copy)Dataset; estimates, not independently audited receipts.
S2City Commission June 20, 2023 approved YMCA concessions and playing-field-use agreementsOfficial source ↗Approved minutes; operational authority and partnership; not title or gross receipts.
S3City Commission July 7, 2025 approved Regional Park turf agreement, $1,623,613.82Official source ↗Authorization, not proof of final construction payment.
S4City of Ardmore FY2025 independently audited financial statementsOfficial source ↗Primary government audit expressly excludes six separately presented component units, including Regional Park Authority.
S5Oklahoma State Auditor Carter County FY2021 financial reportOfficial source ↗County-government audit, not audit of municipal tournament operators.
S6City of Ardmore Regional Park official overviewOfficial source ↗Public park context; distinct campus addresses may be used for fields.
S7City of Ardmore municipal open records guidanceOfficial source ↗Records request process; confirm custodian and response.
S8Oklahoma State DA office district directoryOfficial source ↗Court and prosecutor geographic scope should be checked; district does not audit city finances.
S9Oklahoma State Courts Network docket searchOfficial source ↗No event-specific proceeding/outcome is alleged or authenticated in this report.
S10City of Ardmore signed email request dated October 15, 2026Local research archive: BCMSPORTS Mail — Formal Oklahoma Open Records Act Request, Oct. 15, 2026Sent to city records addresses with attached three-page letter; response not independently confirmed.

Research integrity and publication status: This draft provides a transparent framework to verify source attribution and municipal public benefits, not accusations. All financial estimates and visitor-spending models have explicit limitations. The article has not been published to WordPress, no new official records requests have been sent and no operator responses are implied.

Oklahoma’s Counties of Accountability · Integrity of the Game · October 28, 2026

Previous Post
Norman, Oklahoma: Reaves Park, the $10 Million Public Investment, and the Community-Access Test
Next Post
Tommy Carner Glenpool Baseball, Claremore, Historical Tournament Records & Public-Facility Transparency

Recent Posts

  • Mustang, Oklahoma: Wild Horse Park, Nonexclusive Agreements, and the True Cost of Community Access October 29, 2026
  • Paul Marshall Sallisaw Softball, 55 Historical Events, Public Investment & Financial Transparency October 29, 2026 | Baseball Heaven — USSSA Tournament Directors: The Public Record October 29, 2026
  • Washington County – Bartlesville’s $1 Land Transfer, $10 Fields Lease, $1.2 Million Turf Plan & the Public-Benefit Test October 29, 2026
  • Newcastle Sports Complex – The 11-Field Vision, the $950,000 Land Purchase, and the Community-Access Test October 28, 2026
  • Tommy Carner Glenpool Baseball, Claremore, Historical Tournament Records & Public-Facility Transparency October 28, 2026

Categories

  • Case Study (23)
  • Oklahoma's Counties of Accountability (14)
  • Oklahoma's Fields of Accountability (23)
  • The Journey (27)
  • The Shawnee Minutes (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • USSSA Tournament Directors – The Public Record (17)
  • Youth Sports Transparency (8)

Doctoral Research

Integrity of the Game vs Economic Impact (Politics), The Oklahoma Business Plan.

Doctoral Study-Research

Facebook
YouTube

© Integrity of the Game… by Professor K…

Contacts

Kenneth@BCMSports.net
+405 642 9592